0
Skip to Content
Parapraxis
Home
Articles
Current Issue
About
Masthead
Store
Subscribe
Donate
Parapraxis
Home
Articles
Current Issue
About
Masthead
Store
Subscribe
Donate
Home
Articles
Current Issue
About
Masthead
Store
Subscribe
Donate
Store Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 06
Issue06_stack copy (1).jpg Image 1 of
Issue06_stack copy (1).jpg
Issue06_stack copy (1).jpg

Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 06

US$75.00

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

Order five copies as gifts, for your reading group, your waiting room, your cartel:

In 1911, Sigmund Freud addressed his followers gathered at Nuremberg, where he restated the import of his practice: “the task of psychoanalysis lies not at all in the discovering of complexes, but in the dissolving of resistances.” A formal antipode to political resistance, psychoanalytic resistance dams up desire and obstructs traumatic knowledge. It is conservative, allergic to change, and aims for the kind of frictionless normativity against which the unconscious drives rail. Meanwhile, we associate political resistance with change itself, with a blockade that pushes for revolution—rather than a blockage that censors its very possibility. If we read Freud as urging his followers to help their patients move through their resistance, psychoanalysis is a project on the side of material and political reality by bringing patients out of isolation and into social struggles. However, psychoanalysis is often glossed in reverse: as a project of isolated relief for the stubborn individual. 

Should psychoanalysis only succeed at rendering patients compliant in their cure? Is psychoanalysis a tool for nullifying political resistance? If so, Freud’s edict for the aim of psychoanalysis is now but an epitaph. It would be easy, then, to give up the ghost, to let psychoanalysis go. But why  should psychoanalysis retreat from collective symptoms back into the consulting room for individual treatment—away from strikes, riots, and uprisings, and toward complacency and normativity, if not quite literally marriage and babies? Why should the clinic not dare to be in and of the world?

Feeling restless.  Hunger tactics. Laughing in the face of fascism. Breaking through. Diagnosing revolution. Madness in the Maghreb. Essays by Fady Joudah, Jamieson Webster, Dylan Saba, Yasmin El-Rifae, Ussama Makdisi, Mary Turfah, Hannah Proctor, and more.

In Memory of Joshua Clover (1962-2025).

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

Quantity:
Add To Cart

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

Order five copies as gifts, for your reading group, your waiting room, your cartel:

In 1911, Sigmund Freud addressed his followers gathered at Nuremberg, where he restated the import of his practice: “the task of psychoanalysis lies not at all in the discovering of complexes, but in the dissolving of resistances.” A formal antipode to political resistance, psychoanalytic resistance dams up desire and obstructs traumatic knowledge. It is conservative, allergic to change, and aims for the kind of frictionless normativity against which the unconscious drives rail. Meanwhile, we associate political resistance with change itself, with a blockade that pushes for revolution—rather than a blockage that censors its very possibility. If we read Freud as urging his followers to help their patients move through their resistance, psychoanalysis is a project on the side of material and political reality by bringing patients out of isolation and into social struggles. However, psychoanalysis is often glossed in reverse: as a project of isolated relief for the stubborn individual. 

Should psychoanalysis only succeed at rendering patients compliant in their cure? Is psychoanalysis a tool for nullifying political resistance? If so, Freud’s edict for the aim of psychoanalysis is now but an epitaph. It would be easy, then, to give up the ghost, to let psychoanalysis go. But why  should psychoanalysis retreat from collective symptoms back into the consulting room for individual treatment—away from strikes, riots, and uprisings, and toward complacency and normativity, if not quite literally marriage and babies? Why should the clinic not dare to be in and of the world?

Feeling restless.  Hunger tactics. Laughing in the face of fascism. Breaking through. Diagnosing revolution. Madness in the Maghreb. Essays by Fady Joudah, Jamieson Webster, Dylan Saba, Yasmin El-Rifae, Ussama Makdisi, Mary Turfah, Hannah Proctor, and more.

In Memory of Joshua Clover (1962-2025).

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

P& Caps
P& Caps
US$25.00
Name + Color:
Parapraxis Issue 05: Economies
Parapraxis Issue 05: Economies
US$25.00

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

Order five copies as gifts, for your reading group, your waiting room, your cartel:

In 1911, Sigmund Freud addressed his followers gathered at Nuremberg, where he restated the import of his practice: “the task of psychoanalysis lies not at all in the discovering of complexes, but in the dissolving of resistances.” A formal antipode to political resistance, psychoanalytic resistance dams up desire and obstructs traumatic knowledge. It is conservative, allergic to change, and aims for the kind of frictionless normativity against which the unconscious drives rail. Meanwhile, we associate political resistance with change itself, with a blockade that pushes for revolution—rather than a blockage that censors its very possibility. If we read Freud as urging his followers to help their patients move through their resistance, psychoanalysis is a project on the side of material and political reality by bringing patients out of isolation and into social struggles. However, psychoanalysis is often glossed in reverse: as a project of isolated relief for the stubborn individual. 

Should psychoanalysis only succeed at rendering patients compliant in their cure? Is psychoanalysis a tool for nullifying political resistance? If so, Freud’s edict for the aim of psychoanalysis is now but an epitaph. It would be easy, then, to give up the ghost, to let psychoanalysis go. But why  should psychoanalysis retreat from collective symptoms back into the consulting room for individual treatment—away from strikes, riots, and uprisings, and toward complacency and normativity, if not quite literally marriage and babies? Why should the clinic not dare to be in and of the world?

Feeling restless.  Hunger tactics. Laughing in the face of fascism. Breaking through. Diagnosing revolution. Madness in the Maghreb. Essays by Fady Joudah, Jamieson Webster, Dylan Saba, Yasmin El-Rifae, Ussama Makdisi, Mary Turfah, Hannah Proctor, and more.

In Memory of Joshua Clover (1962-2025).

Now available for pre-order. Copies will ship in July.

You Might Also Like

Stack of 10: From the River to the Sea: The Palestine Issue & Fundraiser parapraxis issue 5 single copy.jpg
Stack of 10: From the River to the Sea: The Palestine Issue & Fundraiser
US$125.00
Parapraxis Issue 05: Economies
Parapraxis Issue 05: Economies
US$25.00
Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 02
Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 02
US$75.00
Sold Out
Stack of 5: From the River to the Sea: The Palestine Issue & Fundraiser Issue05_stack copy.jpg
Stack of 5: From the River to the Sea: The Palestine Issue & Fundraiser
US$60.00
Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 04
Waiting Room Stack: 5 × Issue 04
US$75.00

Magazine
Subscribe
Donate
→ bookshop.org

About
Contact
Events
Twitter

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Thank you!

Parapraxis is published by The Psychosocial Foundation

© The Psychosocial Foundation, 2023